(no subject) - Wikipedia-l - lists.wikimedia.org

List overview All Threads
Download

(no subject)

Indefinite ban problem

Re: [Wikipedia-l] Non-notability...

carlos perez

23 Sep 2007 23 Sep '07

12:52 p.m.

--------------------------------- ¡Sé un mejor asador! Aprende todo sobre asados en: http://mx.yahoo.com/promos/mejorasador.html

Reply

Show replies by date

Matthew Britton

23 Sep 23 Sep

2:09 p.m.

carlos perez wrote:

---------------------------------

I was thinking the same thing. -Gurch

Reply

Milos Rancic

4 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote:

---------------------------------

I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

Reply

Michael Bimmler

4:05 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote:

---------------------------------

I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...

_______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Reply

Thomas Dalton

5:09 p.m.

On 23/09/2007, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote:

---------------------------------

I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...

No need to prove it, it's vacuously true.

Reply

pyrosim

5:32 p.m.

We should make this a meta policy. On 9/23/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 23/09/2007, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote: > > > --------------------------------- I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove

it... No need to prove it, it's vacuously true. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

-- --Dylan Davis

Reply

Thomas Dalton

5:46 p.m.

On 23/09/2007, pyrosim <pyrosim(a)gmail.com> wrote:

We should make this a meta policy.

I've just realised, blanking articles isn't vandalism at all, it improves them by making them 100% accurate. We should unblock all those IP addresses...

Reply

Milos Rancic

7:46 p.m.

Blanking articles is very useful and it should be implemented as Wikimedia wide policy. But, Carlos said something which doesn't have any connection with blanking articles. How can you support such stupidity? I can't believe! On 9/23/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 23/09/2007, pyrosim <pyrosim(a)gmail.com> wrote:

We should make this a meta policy.

I've just realised, blanking articles isn't vandalism at all, it improves them by making them 100% accurate. We should unblock all those IP addresses... _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Reply

Milos Rancic

7:39 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote:

---------------------------------

I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...

You mean that they are able to prove that obvious nonsense which is insulting the half of the Earth? Did you see that they think that they think that they think that there is "no need to prove it"???

Reply

Dan Collins

7:45 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

carlos perez wrote: > > > --------------------------------- I was thinking the same thing.

Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!

You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove

it... You mean that they are able to prove that obvious nonsense which is insulting the half of the Earth? Did you see that they think that they think that they think that there is "no need to prove it"??? _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to. -- ST47 Administrator, en.wikipedia

Reply

Milos Rancic

7:48 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47(a)gmail.com> wrote:

eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.

Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?

Reply

Paul Williams

8:19 p.m.

Someone didn't get the memo. Milos Rancic wrote:

On 9/23/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47(a)gmail.com> wrote:

eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.

Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there? _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Reply

Platonides

8:56 p.m.

Paul Williams wrote:

Someone didn't get the memo.

It had the strange quality of being invisible to anyone who was unfit for his office or unforgivably stupid.

Reply

Ronald Chmara

10:40 p.m.

On Sep 23, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Platonides wrote:

Paul Williams wrote:

Someone didn't get the memo.

It had the strange quality of being invisible to anyone who was unfit for his office or unforgivably stupid.

My lawyers will be in touch with you. -Ronabop

Reply

Brock Weller

29 Sep 29 Sep

1:59 a.m.

My lawyer wrote a short brief that may help. Here: " " On 9/23/07, Ronald Chmara <ron(a)opus1.com> wrote:

On Sep 23, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Platonides wrote:

Paul Williams wrote:

Someone didn't get the memo.

It had the strange quality of being invisible to anyone who was unfit for his office or unforgivably stupid.

My lawyers will be in touch with you. -Ronabop _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

-- -Brock

Reply

Matthew Britton

23 Sep 23 Sep

9:47 p.m.

Milos Rancic wrote:

On 9/23/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47(a)gmail.com> wrote:

eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.

Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?

Perhaps his email client munged it. It said, " ". -Gurch

Reply

Milos Rancic

10:33 p.m.

On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

Milos Rancic wrote:

On 9/23/07, Dan Collins <en.wp.st47(a)gmail.com> wrote:

eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.

Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?

Perhaps his email client munged it. It said, " ".

Weird email client.

Reply

6054

days inactive

6060

days old

wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

16 comments

11 participants

tags (0)

participants (11)

Brock Weller
carlos perez
Dan Collins
Matthew Britton
Michael Bimmler
Milos Rancic
Paul Williams
Platonides
pyrosim
Ronald Chmara
Thomas Dalton