---------------------------------
¡Sé un mejor asador! Aprende todo sobre asados en: http://mx.yahoo.com/promos/mejorasador.html
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
On 23/09/2007, Michael Bimmler mbimmler@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...
No need to prove it, it's vacuously true.
We should make this a meta policy.
On 9/23/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2007, Michael Bimmler mbimmler@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove
it...
No need to prove it, it's vacuously true.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
On 23/09/2007, pyrosim pyrosim@gmail.com wrote:
We should make this a meta policy.
I've just realised, blanking articles isn't vandalism at all, it improves them by making them 100% accurate. We should unblock all those IP addresses...
Blanking articles is very useful and it should be implemented as Wikimedia wide policy. But, Carlos said something which doesn't have any connection with blanking articles. How can you support such stupidity? I can't believe!
On 9/23/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2007, pyrosim pyrosim@gmail.com wrote:
We should make this a meta policy.
I've just realised, blanking articles isn't vandalism at all, it improves them by making them 100% accurate. We should unblock all those IP addresses...
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
On 9/23/07, Michael Bimmler mbimmler@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove it...
You mean that they are able to prove that obvious nonsense which is insulting the half of the Earth? Did you see that they think that they think that they think that there is "no need to prove it"???
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Michael Bimmler mbimmler@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
carlos perez wrote:
I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I think that both of you are wrong. It is not possible to claim something like that!
You can claim everything, though you might have difficulties to prove
it...
You mean that they are able to prove that obvious nonsense which is insulting the half of the Earth? Did you see that they think that they think that they think that there is "no need to prove it"???
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.
On 9/23/07, Dan Collins en.wp.st47@gmail.com wrote:
eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.
Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?
Someone didn't get the memo.
Milos Rancic wrote:
On 9/23/07, Dan Collins en.wp.st47@gmail.com wrote:
eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.
Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
My lawyer wrote a short brief that may help. Here: "
"
On 9/23/07, Ronald Chmara ron@opus1.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Platonides wrote:
Paul Williams wrote:
Someone didn't get the memo.
It had the strange quality of being invisible to anyone who was unfit for his office or unforgivably stupid.
My lawyers will be in touch with you.
-Ronabop
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Milos Rancic wrote:
On 9/23/07, Dan Collins en.wp.st47@gmail.com wrote:
eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.
Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?
Perhaps his email client munged it. It said, " ".
-Gurch
On 9/23/07, Matthew Britton matthew.britton@btinternet.com wrote:
Milos Rancic wrote:
On 9/23/07, Dan Collins en.wp.st47@gmail.com wrote:
eight emails all in response to a blank email. What is this world coming to.
Blank email? You *really* didn't see what is written there?
Perhaps his email client munged it. It said, " ".
Weird email client.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org