This 66.219.221.xxx character is another to watch for - I seem to be getting into an edit war with it over its "Orthodox Baha'i Faith" issues. I researched this group a few months back when I was working on the original Baha'i faith article, and my evidence suggested that they are a tiny splinter group (a few hundred members) of a religion with 5 million members.
Anyway, I'd be grateful if you could watch out for this character - I know Brian Vibber has already run into its ideological agenda. I'm leaving for India again in a week or two so I won't be able to watch it closely enough.
Manning
I've emailed with him, if it's the same guy. I'm not sure that the characterization of "character" and "it" are really necessary or useful.
His main concern, when I met him, was that people from the main Baha'i faith are trying to suppress information about the splinter group. This is how he interpreted one edit of his articles. I assured him that this was unlikely -- to my knowledge, no one from the Baha'i faith is even aware of our existence, much less monitors us looking for his descriptions of the break.
We will face this problem in a much greater way when the Scientologists find us.
--Jimbo
Manning Bartlett wrote:
This 66.219.221.xxx character is another to watch for - I seem to be getting into an edit war with it over its "Orthodox Baha'i Faith" issues. I researched this group a few months back when I was working on the original Baha'i faith article, and my evidence suggested that they are a tiny splinter group (a few hundred members) of a religion with 5 million members.
Anyway, I'd be grateful if you could watch out for this character - I know Brian Vibber has already run into its ideological agenda. I'm leaving for India again in a week or two so I won't be able to watch it closely enough.
Manning
On lun, 2002-04-08 at 16:55, Jimmy Wales wrote:
I've emailed with him, if it's the same guy. I'm not sure that the characterization of "character" and "it" are really necessary or useful.
His main concern, when I met him, was that people from the main Baha'i faith are trying to suppress information about the splinter group.
That explains why he's been quietly removing links to the mainstream [[Baha'i Faith]] in articles that had linked to both [[Baha'i Faith]] and [[Orthodox Baha'i Faith]]. *cough* *cough*
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org