"Magnus Manske" magnus.manske@web.de schrieb:

IIRC, we have already limited additions to "encyclopedic contents", which would separate between amateur volleyball players and religous figures ;-)

It's certainly not a criticism at the specific example. I know too little about it to make a judgement. It was more the general principle that I was commenting on. Basically, we want much, we want more, but we do not want everything.

Still, "encyclopedic content" is too vague to work on, and conflicts will remain. My own principle is the "compound encyclopedia" idea - take all encyclopedia-similar books, that is encyclopedias on a single subject and such. What I'd like Wikipedia to be, is the 'merge' of all those.

Andre Engels