At 09:19 PM 27/08/02 -0400, Tom Parmenter wrote:
|From: Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)ualberta.ca>
|Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:49:45 -0600
|Hear hear! We say that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and then we go and
|have articles like [[Robert Braden]] and [[Ununpentium]] which would get
|laughed out of any half-decent dictionary as practically useless.
Robert Braden's mother must be so proud.
I'm not saying that Robert Braden shouldn't have an article in Wikipedia,
if he is indeed noteworthy. I am saying that an article which consists
solely of "Editor of RFC 1123.", and which is linked to only from a line in
the article [[RFC 1123]] which reads "Robert Braden (editor).", is a fairly
useless article all things considered. :)
The RFC 1123 article is itself pretty sparse on information, though not
quite as bad.
But I'd have to
say that my article on [[Ununennium]] is much better than the one pn
[[Ununpentium]].
Agreement, Ununennium looks pretty good.