I hit the send button too fast, here is the rest:
Parenthetical disambiguation should also be avoided whenever possible.
It would be idiotic to have a non-article list with a disambiguation notice at [[Paul Simon]] with links to [[Paul Simon (musician)]] and [[Paul Simon (politician)]] just because these two people share the same name. Of course, the musician (who is hands down the most widely known person by the name "Paul Simon") should be at [[Paul Simon]] and the politician should be at an article that has his middle initial (Like [[George W. Bush]]) and if that doesn't work then the hideous [[Paul Simon (politician)]] would have to be used. Notice, the decision to use a parenthetical title here was a last resort and was only used for the less well-known Paul Simon.
In addition; if one thing is known only by a one word name, and another thing is usually called by the same one word name in its native context but is often also called by a naturally disambiguated two word name, there is NO need to have a disambiguation page at the one word page title (because the context here is an online hyper-linked encyclopedia, not the native context of the two word term). We can reasonably assume a person of average or greater intelligence making a link intended for the two word term, will make a link to the two word term and not the one word term because this is an encyclopedia and we should assume that person has enough sense to naturally disambiguate the link.
For example: It would be equally dumb to turn [[worm]] into a non-article disambiguation page just because there is also such things as computer worms and candy worms.
It is my opinion that one of the reasons why wikipedia has been as preposterously successful as it has, is due the ease with which links can be made from one article to the next. Unfortunately, as wikipedia grows, ambiguities will increasingly pop up and resolving those ambiguities might make linking more and more tedious as time goes by -- if we are not careful.
In order to dramatically slow this, I propose that we should be very careful when deciding to make disambiguation pages and only make them when true ambiguities exist (also, to avoid parenthetical disambiguation whenever possible). No one of average or greater intelligence would link to [[Paris]] in the context of a hyper-linked encyclopedia and reasonably expect that link to go to an article about Paris, Texas. I also proposse to make it a policy that whoever makes these pages should have to fix each and every misdirected link so that they point directly to where they intend.
--maveric149
At 01:49 AM 6/29/02 -0700, you wrote:
We can reasonably assume a person of average or greater intelligence making a link intended for the two word term, will make a link to the two word term and not the one word term because this is an encyclopedia and we should assume that person has enough sense to naturally disambiguate the link.
But with a disambiguation page, we don't have to impose upon the editor's intelligence even _this_ much. Disambiguation pages make linking easier.
Besides, I thought the idea of using [[planet Mercury]] had already been rejected. :)
For example: It would be equally dumb to turn [[worm]] into a non-article disambiguation page just because there is also such things as computer worms and candy worms.
Candy worms, sure, but I can easily imagine writing an article about something computery and referring simply to "worms" within it because the "computer" context is already clear to the reader of the article. Why make the editor check every link to be sure that it doesn't lead to some completely irrelevant article that just happens to have a name in common with what you really wanted?
I also proposse to make it a policy that whoever makes these pages should have to fix each and every misdirected link so that they point directly to where they intend.
This is already mentioned on the disambiguation page: "A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix the mis-directed links that will be created when the disambiguation page is made." What's the difference between a policy and a code of honor on Wikipedia?
-- "Let there be light." - Last words of Bomb #20, "Dark Star"
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org