There was some discussion last week about reforming meta. I finally had a chance to look around there this morning, and I see that there is a lot of absolute crap on there.
In particular, "Saprtacus" has been using it as his own personal anarchist bulletin board. That's not appropriate, and so I'm going to delete all of it.
It's perfectly fine to have non-objective essays on meta, but they need to be essay *about wikipedia*, at least tangentially.
There was some discussion last week about reforming meta. I finally had a chance to look around there this morning, and I see that there is a lot of absolute crap on there.
In particular, "Saprtacus" has been using it as his own personal anarchist bulletin board. That's not appropriate, and so I'm going to delete all of it.
Thank you, Jimbo. I hope you did give the person(s) involved some advance warning to save their stuff (remember not everyone writes in a text editor), although technically you didn't have to. I for one would love to use Meta for organizing some aspects of development, and the very low S/N ratio made that hard.
Regards,
Erik
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org