If we allow fair use of images, which we currently do, we may want to develop guidelines for what is and what is not a good example for fair use. Some thoughts:
Good fair use:
- Press/publicity photos. These are typically intended for republication and it is unlikely that anyone will get in trouble for using them in any way. Exceptions: Press/publicity photos which have explicit restrictions on use. - Screenshots and screen captures: A screenshot, especially one done by yourself, is usually such a small excerpt from the entire work that fair use is perfectly applicable. Companies don't make money selling screenshots. Exceptions: Shots of programs whose primary value is their graphical content (e.g. clipboard collections) or shots containing clearly copyrighted commercial artwork. - Important historical photos: Leader meets leader, building explodes, war crimes etc. Here the educational purpose is prevalent. Exceptions: Photos of which we know that their copyright is rigidly enforced. - Sound/music snippets: There exists a lot of precedent law regarding this, and many large websites offer short (10-second) snippets of popular music
Gray area:
- General portrait/celberity photos. Here it is important to at least try to obtain permission and figure out what the copyright situation is. - Current news photos. Depends on the importance of the news and the photo. Again, it should be attempted to obtain permission first. - Album covers, movie posters. Rule of thumb: If it looks really cool (nice high resolution photo), it's probably not OK (there are actually companies that sell these things).
Black area:
- Modern maps. Map producers directly compete with us, and it is generally hard to see why we should be allowed to take their work for free, just like we could not simply take the articles from the Encyclopaedia Britannica. - Textbook illustrations. See above - this is an active market, and we can be expected to create our own. - Photos of famous, non-historical buildings, places etc. - we can shoot these ourselves.
Of course, pictures in the "black area" can be used if permission can be obtained.
Regards,
Erik
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote:
If we allow fair use of images, which we currently do, we may want to develop guidelines for what is and what is not a good example for fair use. Some thoughts:
Good fair use: [...]
- Important historical photos: Leader meets leader, building explodes, war
crimes etc. Here the educational purpose is prevalent. Exceptions: Photos of which we know that their copyright is rigidly enforced. [...]
The principle of fair use is depending on the way we use the photo, not on the way copyright is enforced. If it is 'fair use', copyright grants us the right to use the image. If it's not 'fair use' someone can enforce the copyright and require removal of the picture.
The question of including the picture has to be based on fair use, not on the enforcement policy of the copyright owner.
JeLuF
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org