Check these things on hu.wikipedia.org: See [[Hévízi-tó TT]] (you can find it in recent changes if you're not accent-read), and check "Mi hivatkozik erre" ("who links here"). Nobody. Now go to [[Magyarország természetvédelmi területei]] (in the recent changes as well), and look for the string "Hévízi-tó TT", and you'll see: the article contains link to the one before. However its link is "red" or "question marked". If you click on it (create a non-existing article) then you'll realise that it does exist, since the editor window contains the actual text. If I would edit and save the second article I'm sure it'd heal (preview shows it healed) but I don't want to mess it up until someone check what the bug is. Brion? See anything? (The article can be fixed, naturally, but the bug should be instead. :-)) _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Peter Gervai wrote: We have the same prob on the french wikipedia. look at [[barite]] there is a link in [[baryum]] but if you look in what link here it's empty _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

Might it be an option to every month or every few months re-create the links and blinks tables from the cur table, so that all database inconsistencies of this kind get resolved?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:48:20AM +0100, Andre Engels wrote: It is the wrong approach. There must not be any inconsistencies of any kind. The bugs should be fixed instead, as Brion mentioned. The current bug in action going to be fixed, the consistency check going to run after that, once, and we keep our eyes open for any new inconsistencies which may be a sign of a next bug to fix.