Ah so. Sorry for my error. Yes, its true that your
discussion of implementing something specific on a
specific wikipedia belongs on intlwiki-l. However,
the notion of a new Ideographic wikipedia that doesnt
yet exist except in mine owne imagination-- does
indeed belong on this list.
Xie xie ni,
Menchi: No, I did not suggest to Brion or anyone the
separation of Simplified and
Traditional Chinese versions. I don't know who said
it. As far as I know,
all active and regular contributors there are fine
with the co-existence of
the two versions.
What we /have/ been saying is to implement an
Traditional<->Simplified conversion, since the
phrasing is completely
identical (the wording occasionally isn't.
Anyway, shouldn't this be at Intlwiki-L.?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software