On 30/03/07, Monk monkbel@gmail.com wrote: ...
This speculation with such aggressive words doesn't help your case, it can only make your case worse. I don't even hope any more that you
... There's no my *case*, as I'm not on trial here.
And there's no *my* case as there were a lots of folks since the very beginning of the be:wp in 2004, who were asking the same question.
This all very water under the bridge, still, anybody can browse the archives.
It always went like: "Why the exclusive version of language on wiki calling itself Belarusian" and answered like: "Tough luck guys, we were here first, and with your Communist language you just scram to wikia or to wherever you please! The narkamautsy this days!".
Oh, right, you were retaining some token presence of the articles in the normative version of language, "kindly tolerating" like, but nobody is stranger these days to the Theory of Symbolic Representation and to the concept of Live Shield.
And you've lost some good editors because of that. As if you cared.
Aha, and don't forget to tell good folks that in the Belarusian lingual context "pravapis" may denote not only "orthography" but also "grammar" in general.
---