you wrote:
[snip]
Much of the most recent stuff really isn't THAT
non-NPOV -- although it
takes an entire article of words for this person to say, maybe, a couple of
sentences of information (much of the leftover stuff is even not as non-NPOV
as what Ed Poor or the Cruncrator contributes....). It is a bear to wade
[snip]
watchful eye to make sure 24 has been tamed a bit. If
this person is on a
similiar non-NPOV level as Ed or Crunc I can live with that. (talking about
level of severity, not ideology)
It's "cunctator", not "crunctator".
Do you actually have any awareness of any biased material I have
contributed, or are you just going on hearsay? I'd really like to know
if my conception of my contributions is incorrect, or if you're at
fault.
I just want you to know how what you write makes me feel, which is
rather hurt and insulted, inasmuch as my contributions have been
predominantly to the creation of the most popular entries on the site
(in terms of hits and interlinking) and careful editing of other
entries, and not to the propagation of any particular agenda.
I have been forceful of my opinions about the nature of Wikipedia, but
that's separate from being on a "non-NPOV level" like Ed.
Am I wrong?
yours,
tc