Michael Snow a écrit :
And for the other projects, a wiki is sometimes far from ideal, true enough. That's been recognized for some time, which is why there are ongoing efforts to adapt or extend the software to better serve those objectives. In the meantime, the wiki is the tool we've got. Tired cliches aside, I'm sure better ones would be welcomed if somebody cares to offer us more tools.
That's not false. But a question remains : why did Wikipedia become a hit, with millions of articles in hundred of languages, while Nupedia, which actually followed the same principles as Wikipedia, except it was not a wiki, never reached 100 articles ?
Traroth