Michael Snow a écrit :
And for the other projects, a wiki is sometimes far
from ideal, true
enough. That's been recognized for some time, which is why there are
ongoing efforts to adapt or extend the software to better serve those
objectives. In the meantime, the wiki is the tool we've got. Tired
cliches aside, I'm sure better ones would be welcomed if somebody cares
to offer us more tools.
That's not false. But a question remains : why did Wikipedia become a hit, with
millions of articles in hundred of languages, while Nupedia, which actually followed the
same principles as Wikipedia, except it was not a wiki, never reached 100 articles ?
Traroth