Ben Yates wrote:
But passers-by will always be exposed to the underbelly: there's no way every single article in the wiki could have a stable , agreed-on version. The top 5% of articles, sure (and those articles will command disproportionate traffic), but The solution is to have a really, really good interface that makes it absolutely clear that (1) the version they're seeing is dynamic, and (2) there's also a stable version, a click away.
Oh, I agree; I'd love to see something like this. The thing I've been arguing about is setting it up the other way around so that the default version they're seeing is stable and that the dynamic version is a click away.