Ben Yates wrote:
But passers-by will always be exposed to the
underbelly: there's no way
every single article in the wiki could have a stable , agreed-on version.
The top 5% of articles, sure (and those articles will command
disproportionate traffic), but The solution is to have a really, really good interface
that makes it
absolutely clear that (1) the version they're seeing is dynamic, and (2)
there's also a stable version, a click away.
Oh, I agree; I'd love to see something like this. The thing I've been
arguing about is setting it up the other way around so that the default
version they're seeing is stable and that the dynamic version is a click
away.