We use a similar mechanism which serves the same function, but not on the a priori basis Larry would have it, but on an as needed basis. Essentially if things do not go well in the editing of an article, we fall back on administrative actions and the dispute resolution process. He would put someone "in charge" whether needed or not.
Fred
On May 28, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Delirium wrote:
I thought some people might be interested that Larry Sanger's written an article clarifying what he has in mind for a collaborative model that improves on what he sees as Wikipedia's shortcomings:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2006/5/26/162017/011
(I don't agree with most of the article, but not all his suggestions are completely wrong, either.)
-Mark
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l