We use a similar mechanism which serves the same function, but not on
the a priori basis Larry would have it, but on an as needed basis.
Essentially if things do not go well in the editing of an article, we
fall back on administrative actions and the dispute resolution
process. He would put someone "in charge" whether needed or not.
Fred
On May 28, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Delirium wrote:
I thought some people might be interested that Larry
Sanger's
written an
article clarifying what he has in mind for a collaborative model that
improves on what he sees as Wikipedia's shortcomings:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2006/5/26/162017/011
(I don't agree with most of the article, but not all his
suggestions are
completely wrong, either.)
-Mark
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l