You did indeed miss something.
Jimbo said "The valid point that Jack and Naree would be making if
they weren't so obviously trolling us".
Now, while some might argue that you can be trolling without being a
_troll_, I think it's generally agreed that anybody who trolls for
suckers is a troll.
Mark
On 24/09/05, Gerrit Holl <gerrit(a)nl.linux.org> wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
When Mark Williamson calls you a troll, you must
really be one, I
think. Especially if Jimbo Wales agrees.
Rowan's suggestion of a machine translation solution to the problem is
worth looking at to satisfy Wikipedia "Unionists", but the needs of
Wikipedia "Nationalists"can't be bullied and ostracised as
"trolls".
So, are you calling Jimbo Wales a bully and an ostracist?
I don't think Jimbo Wales called anyone a troll. He wrote:
But inflammatory and patently false claims are
likely to be taken as _trolling_
That is not calling someone a troll. Or did I miss something?
Gerrit.
--
Temperature in Luleå, Norrbotten, Sweden:
| Current temperature 05-09-24 12:59:57 11.9 degrees Celsius ( 53.4F) |
--
Det finns inte dåligt väder, bara dåliga kläder.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE