Klingon funny ...... ? I feel recognizing Orcish actually beats that!
Waerth
Phroziac wrote:
Klingon? rofl.
On 9/28/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
>Andre Engels wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 9/28/05, Phroziac <phroziac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Most conlangs should not even be considered. But, certainly there are
>>>conlangs that are as notable as Esperanto, which we don't have
>>>wikipedias for?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I don't think there is any other conlang "as notable as Esperanto".
>>Wikipedia currently exists in Esperanto, Interlingua, Ido, Lojban and
>>Volapük, although the last two aren't very big.
>>
>>
>>
>I looked at ISO 639-3 and it proposes to recognize 24 conlangs:
><http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Afrihili&action=edit>Afrihili,
>Brithenig, Ceqli, Delason, Dutton World Speedwords, Esperanto, Glosa,
>Ido, Interglossa, Interlingua, Interlingue, Jakelimotu, Klingon, Láadan,
>Linga, Lojban, Novial, Occidental, Orcish, Quenya, Romanova, Sindarin,
>Tceqli, and Volapük This unfortunately includes Klingon. Toki Pona is
>not on the list. It looks as though they have dropped Europanto. It
>does put their reliability in doubt.
>
>Ec
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wikipedia-l mailing list
>Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wikipedia-l mailing list
>Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>