On 28/03/07, Jan Marozau <janmarozau(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2007/3/28, Yury Tarasievich
<yury.tarasievich(a)gmail.com>om>:
...
You mean letter ґ, don't you? But it's not
used widely by belarusian
wikipedians, who write in tarashkevica.
It's used quite widely. Anyway, it's there, and it's introduced in the
places even the Belarusian phonology doesn't know about.
The difference is really quite small. Mostly in usage
of ь, declension of
nouns and some other trifles.
Oh yeah. People study for years to get all those "trifles" right, and
you forget revamping half the vocabulary, anyway.
The point is that both grammars are used in old
variant of wikipedia.
No, they are not. Standard version was from beginning kept as the
second grade language. No categories, no interface, no rules etc.
Rules imposing maintaining of the version of the language article's
written in, with clause mandating asking the permission of the
previous author -- in Wikipedia, good grief! That was the whole point
of the 2006 yeras discussions on Meta and be: -- see archives.