"Angela" wrote:
[snip]
For example, some issues already raised are whether
links to
Placeopedia should be added automatically to all Wikipedia articles
that have a corresponding entry in Placeopedia. There is already a
template for this on the English Wikipedia
(<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Placeopedia>) but so far any
links have only been added manually.
Specifically in connection with this (I created the template and I suspect
most of the additions are mine to date), is there any particular problem
with adding this template to each article referenced from Placeopedia?
Someone on their list said we should be using a proper geo-thingy system,
but I'm not wanting to wait for ages until they decide what they're doing, I
want to do stuff now.
As a point of principle, would it be OK if some took it upon themselves to
obtain some sort of list from Placeopedia and instruct a bot to add the
appropriate links to the appropriate article?
Please note that I'm not volunteering myself at this stage, since my
Internet access is strictly work-based and therefore does not allow the time
to do it properly. I just want to know whether this idea is overstepping the
bounds.
I know we can't do the equivalent with say IMDb, but this is because of
copyright problems. Placeopedia is using Wikipedia data to connect through
to Google Maps: I can't see that there would be an equivalent problem.
I would hate for an opportunity like this, of getting something really
useful up and running really quickly, to be lost while we dither.
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]