On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:32:29AM +0300, Gutza wrote:
Erik, a process works well if the result of that
process is a good
thing. I mean, I could easily get from over 130 submissions down to 1 in
about 2 milliseconds by picking a random one. But what we wanted, or at
least what I think we wanted, was to pick the best logo, not just to
pick a logo from 130 proposals. Best looking, most usable, most
representative. Best. Logo. And we failed. It's not the best. And it's
not a logo. Sorry, the process not only didn't go well, it failed
miserably IMHO.
I fully agree with you. The result of this vote was disastrous,
the result of the previous vote was disastrous too. I hope that's the last
time we were deciding anything by vote.