Jimmy Wales <jwales@...> writes:
Regarding Klingon, I have no objections to it.
I guess when it comes right down to it what I mainly want is that we
have some external objective way to determine the difference between a
language and a vanity project. I don't particularly care what
official list we use.
Would the ISO 639 list be sufficiently objective? I imagine they don't add just
anybody's pet conlang to their list.
Cheers,
Philip