What really baffles me here is how relatively petty
incidents can cause people to write lengthy editorial
articles, philosophizing about "key shifts in society"
in general and alleged conspiracies at Wikipedia in
particular (while the actual explanation is much more
mundane). The only reason I can think of seems to be
superabundance of time combined with a total lack of
more fulfilling occupation in life.
Arbeo
--- Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> schrieb:
On 9/18/05, Stirling Newberry
<stirling.newberry(a)xigenics.net> wrote:
Then that is a huge user interface and security
hole - because
someone looking at the history of the image would
think that the
original uploader uploaded the image. In an
organization that relies
on users being able to track and document
problems
this is gap in
that ability.
Look at the bottom of the image page. There is your
file history.
Sam
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden:
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org