I am badly disappointed at the willingness some
french-speaking editors show to delete articles
dealing with epilation or swimming suit.
I know this guy very well ;)
I never was against the topic. The day I deleted it (a long time ago
for me), it was unintentionnaly. Aoineko reverted it as soon as I told
him (15 seconds later) and that's the reason why he was the apparent
author of the article, if my memory is clear. I am accountable
for that, and that's the only time I did such a thing.
[...]
"an '''apple''' is a [[fruit]]"
So, why can this one be acceptable as a stub, but an
article on bresilian swimming suit not be ?
There is quite more information in the
apple stub.
That is the reason why we use discussion page and mailing list : to come
to an agreement. I think and said that the 10K article objective have
induced a lower average quality. My opinion is quality is a better
way to promote wikipedia than quantity. Being the 1st, 2nd or 10th
wikipedia is a weaker motivation than trying to write accurate and
well written article.
Given the fact we have time, and no constraint to publish at a given
deadline and we claim to be an encyclopedia, where the focus should
really be for you : having 10K articles and a lot of craps, or 5K
articles with a minimum standard of quality/information?
Anyway Ant, as long as we don't have an agreement, I will
not do anything else than complain ;).
Jul
Psychology. Mind over matter. Mind under matter? It doesn't matter.
Never mind.