Mark,
I encourage you to go ahead with the work. If you believe in its value, how many others do you need? :-)
Regards,
Marc Riddell
on 4/2/08 3:48 PM, Mark Williamson at node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
This is something you have been preaching and I have to say, it is absolutely untrue.
There are ways to refer to new concepts without creating words that do not exist in the existing literature. For example, Navajo did not invent a new word to refer to a computer, instead it is called "metal that you write with with a mind of its own" (this is very long-winded, even in Navajo, so most people will just call it a "computer", however the terminology exists and it is not a made-up new word). For example, the Hebrew word for electricity comes from a Biblical word that means an aura.
Languages are meant to adapt and be elastic. As long as we are not adding made-up words to a language (for example if I created a word "computerious" in Ancient Greek to mean "computer"), we can still write about modern concepts without extending vocabulary beyond its limits. This has been done before and it continues to be done.
Mark
On 02/04/2008, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Marc, Exactly in a dead language you do NOT want innovation because as a consequence it is no longer that language. Thanks, GerardM
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.net wrote:
I wouldn't dedicated too much effort to the Old English Wikipedia if I were you. Who's going to read it? You're just producing learning aids for people learning the language, you're not really creating an encyclopaedia.
So much for creativity and innovation, Thomas :-(. A person is usually advised not to attempt something because of possible negative effects
and/or
outcome. Is that the case here? I think not.
on 4/2/08 1:11 PM, Thomas Dalton at thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
The negative effects are the loss of his time. That's only really a negative effect for him, <snip>
How many innovators have been cautioned not to waste their time on something? I would think that would be for him to be concerned about.
Sounds like a worthwhile project to me.
What will it achieve? In particular, how will it further out goal to provide the sum of human knowledge to people?
Thomas, you speak of "sum" as though it were finite. It's about discovery, perhaps the greatest of purposes.
Marc
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l