On 08-08-2001, koyaanisqatsi(a)nupedia.com wrote thusly :
My proposition
is to start a new page with a link from the Homepage
that would organize teams for work on some subjects.<br> I don\'t mean
just <b>one</b> article, rather more broad subjects like existentialism,
art nouveau style, or cytology. These issues require some more thought on
design and some planning and some cross-sectional discussion.<br>
Interesting
suggestion. I suppose eventually it might seem necessary,
but I thought the appeal of wikipedia was that it was self-governing.
The suggestion seems a bit like what Nupedia does already. Maybe I
misunderstand you.
Nupedia is a separate project. A distinct group of entries
require
knowledge from different fields. I was just thinking how it can be tackled.
Sometimes we
need a collaboration across national Wikipedias. Usually
national Wikipedias take from the English one but Wikipedians from,
for instance, Catalonia can help with entries like
A good suggestion, I think, at
least until the other wikipedias become
self-sufficient. Many of the other wikipedia don't have much in the
way of entries. How would it be implemented, though? I'm just leery
of suggestions to impose structure on wikipedia.
To propagate appeals for
collaboration in special kinds of pages in
national wikipedias and in 'Recent Changes' pages on all wikipedias
we all read 'Recent Changes' by habit, don't we ?
Regards,
kpj.
--
Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz, M.D | Co to jest wierność kobiety ? Jest to obawa
Czestochowa, Poland ... | przed utratą zdobytej pozycji. Fiodor
Więcej cytatów :
http://www.cytaty.phg.pl