On 15/05/06, Berto albertoserra@ukr.net wrote: ...
The problem is in that if we get directly involved in the BE: internal affairs this is going to be read as a political victory of one side on another. My proposition hence regards ONLY the formal side of the intervention. I propose not to start a judgement on BE itself, but to produce a general mandatory policy for a wider set of such cases. That is, the situation IMHO does require a third party intervention, but it must be made in the softer possible way.
...
Right. And exactly the reason for my proposals in the first place -- I believe that the conflict could be resolved on basis of general WP rules/policy per se, which would resolve the situation "quietly", with no cheering and sneering.
But those folks somehow just can't make themselves believe that my requests are valid. :)
-regards