On 15/05/06, Berto <albertoserra(a)ukr.net> wrote:
The problem is in that if we get directly involved in
the BE: internal
affairs this is going to be read as a political victory of one side on
another. My proposition hence regards ONLY the formal side of the
intervention. I propose not to start a judgement on BE itself, but to
produce a general mandatory policy for a wider set of such cases. That is,
the situation IMHO does require a third party intervention, but it must be
made in the softer possible way.
Right. And exactly the reason for my proposals in the first place -- I
believe that the conflict could be resolved on basis of general WP
rules/policy per se, which would resolve the situation "quietly", with
no cheering and sneering.
But those folks somehow just can't make themselves believe that my
requests are valid. :)