Ray Saintonge wrote:
<snip>
Thanks to all of you who responded on this. The only
useful value for
the the article that comes to mind is as a convenient long list of
pseudo-random numbers when somebody needs one.
<snip>
There is faster algorithms to get pseudo-random numbers :o)
--
Ashar Voultoiz - WP++++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hashar