Hoi, The best bit is that it makes KNOL and Wikipedia share the same aims. If there is one thing, we can use their content .... Thanks, GerardM
On Dec 14, 2007 10:59 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Tim 'avatar' Bartel wikipedia@computerkultur.org wrote:
David Gerard schrieb am 14.12.2007 09:22:
On 14/12/2007, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
From google
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html
Just wondering what people think. :)
It's not free content, so that immediately makes it less useful or interesting in our terms. Sounds like about.com or Scholarpedia, which are also non-free.
http://www.google.com/images/blogs/knol_lg.png According to the Screenshot it would probably be released under CC-BY-Something.
Oooh. Straight CC-by-3.0? That's excellent! If they require release under a free licence then that's a BIG WIN for our aims.
- d.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l