Hoi,
The best bit is that it makes KNOL and Wikipedia share the same aims. If
there is one thing, we can use their content ....
Thanks,
GerardM
On Dec 14, 2007 10:59 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Tim 'avatar' Bartel
<wikipedia(a)computerkultur.org> wrote:
David Gerard schrieb am 14.12.2007 09:22:
> On 14/12/2007, cohesion <cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
>> From google
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html
>> Just wondering what people think. :)
> It's not free content, so that
immediately makes it less useful or
> interesting in our terms. Sounds like
about.com or Scholarpedia, which
> are also non-free.
http://www.google.com/images/blogs/knol_lg.png
According to the Screenshot it would probably be released under
CC-BY-Something.
Oooh. Straight CC-by-3.0? That's excellent! If they require release
under a free licence then that's a BIG WIN for our aims.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l