The best bit is that it makes KNOL and Wikipedia share the same aims. If
there is one thing, we can use their content ....
On Dec 14, 2007 10:59 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Tim 'avatar' Bartel
David Gerard schrieb am 14.12.2007 09:22:
> On 14/12/2007, cohesion <cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
>> From google
>> Just wondering what people think. :)
> It's not free content, so that
immediately makes it less useful or
> interesting in our terms. Sounds like about.com
or Scholarpedia, which
> are also non-free.
According to the Screenshot it would probably be released under
Oooh. Straight CC-by-3.0? That's excellent! If they require release
under a free licence then that's a BIG WIN for our aims.
Wikipedia-l mailing list