On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:20:51PM +1000, Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
I STRONGLY disagree with this. Who's going to judge what is more
'important' or what to delete?
The usual suspects.
I don't think it's a big deal to have books
listed or movies or
anything...
It reduces the usefulness of these pages. It's less interesting to
have a page that lists every little thing that happened in a certain year
including the death of somebodies favorite goldfish.
when the page gets too lengthy then it can be broken
up.
That would mean the format depends upon how much has been added for a certain
year.
Then we'll have a ready-made list for a
subpage.
Please don't mention the s-word.
Of course if you really want to keep them off the year
pages what you need
to do is to make a template for a 'Published/Produced in this year' page
for people to put them on...
The problem is not that we don't want published works on these pages, but
only the ones that are considered very important.
the wikipedia's supposed to be about completeness
after all!
Wikipedia as a whole is, yes, but this is not necessarily true for
all individual pages.
-- Jan Hidders