On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:20:51PM +1000, Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
I STRONGLY disagree with this. Who's going to judge what is more 'important' or what to delete?
The usual suspects.
I don't think it's a big deal to have books listed or movies or anything...
It reduces the usefulness of these pages. It's less interesting to have a page that lists every little thing that happened in a certain year including the death of somebodies favorite goldfish.
when the page gets too lengthy then it can be broken up.
That would mean the format depends upon how much has been added for a certain year.
Then we'll have a ready-made list for a subpage.
Please don't mention the s-word.
Of course if you really want to keep them off the year pages what you need to do is to make a template for a 'Published/Produced in this year' page for people to put them on...
The problem is not that we don't want published works on these pages, but only the ones that are considered very important.
the wikipedia's supposed to be about completeness after all!
Wikipedia as a whole is, yes, but this is not necessarily true for all individual pages.
-- Jan Hidders