Apparently, it's more important to them to use their own spelling rules.
Perhaps we should start a new English Wikipedia for hXc kids who want
to TyPe In AlTcApS tO mAkE a PoLiTiCaL sTaTeMeNt? (which is exactly
what it seems like people using nas^a niva are trying to do)
Mark
On 28/03/07, Yury Tarasievich <yury.tarasievich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 29/03/07, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What is so /horrible/ about the official
orthography that you can't use it?
Your language needs help. I think at this point you need to forget
your divisions, and do whatever is necessary to keep above water,
which for me seems to be adopting official orthography and pitching in
tothe new be.wp.
That's exactly what I'm preaching to those guys for years. It's not
that the standard (official) version is that good, it's just the
language. But it's widely accepted, and that's the very final "it".
---
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.