Daniel Mayer wrote:
Is the level of detail in this article:
appropriate for Wikipedia? Or would it be better to have such an article in a
Wikigeology project? I would certainly hate to see similarly detailed [[Biology
of ...]] articles not be created for species in Wikipedia because the same
content is in Wikispecies. Or worse, for them to exist in both and thus half
the contributor base working on each of them.
Wouldn't the number of articles of this type be a factor? As long as
it's the only one it might as well stay where it is. A Wikigeology
project is theoretically conceivable, but nothing can happen until
someone has actually conceived it and is willing to play a leading role
in its development. More people think they know about the world's
animals than about its geological structure. It may be necessary to
develop a Wikiatlas before a Wikigeology project.