Daniel Mayer wrote:
Is the level of detail in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_the_Zion_and_Kolob_canyons_area
appropriate for Wikipedia? Or would it be better to have such an article in a Wikigeology project? I would certainly hate to see similarly detailed [[Biology of ...]] articles not be created for species in Wikipedia because the same content is in Wikispecies. Or worse, for them to exist in both and thus half the contributor base working on each of them.
Wouldn't the number of articles of this type be a factor? As long as it's the only one it might as well stay where it is. A Wikigeology project is theoretically conceivable, but nothing can happen until someone has actually conceived it and is willing to play a leading role in its development. More people think they know about the world's animals than about its geological structure. It may be necessary to develop a Wikiatlas before a Wikigeology project.
Ec