Node, the Ronline proposal was basically a proposal to *save* the Moldovan Wikipedia with a few compromises. I don't know why you're saying that the result "could've tipped the other way". The other way was the shutting down of the Moldovan Wikipedia. The Ronline proposal basically enabled the Moldovan Wikipedia to go forward, which is why it was voted by all the three users you claim are legitimate (me, you and Dmitriid). Had Gabix been given the right to vote, I am nearly certain he would have voted for the Ronline proposal (instead of the shutting down option).
I have observed your arguments with many people on the Moldovan language and Romanian language articles on Wikipedia (and mostly I have chosen not to involve myself) but I think that you need to understand that in a case like this, compromise is necessary. The "chirilica" inclusion *is* necessary and is a reasonable compromise. The only way to have voted against that inclusion was to have voted against the Ronline proposal, in which case the Moldovan Wikipedia would have been shut down. You had the chance to make an amendment even, and yet you didn't. Dmitriid made one (about Wikipedia in romana instead of Wikipedia Romania, I think) and his was voted in.
However, as I said on the Moldovan Wikipedia, anyone has the chance to propose a new proposal or call a vote on the existing proposal or model. So, if you're unhappy about the chirilica inclusion, then propose an amendment and put it up for voting. Until that, the Ronline proposal must be fully implemented, because it was voted in, and one of the inclusions must be the chirilica interwiki.
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs