On 27-07-2003, Daniel Mayer wrote thusly :
Kpjas wrote:
The Sifter idea was a compromise but a
better proposal than using dead Nupedia.
Nupedia, right now, is dead. The /only/ thing that we would use is the name
under a new framework.
If I understand you correctly you propose that Brilliant
prose is a waiting
room for Nupedia. And then Nupedia approval process (peer review) comes
into play. Right ?
If so I am against it.
Regards,
Kpjas.