If the wiki request gets past a certain date with no action, it seems to make sense to move it to an archive. Just need a policy for that, if there isn't one already.
James
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Wouter Steenbeek Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 6:28 AM To: wikipedia-l@wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Requests page
Dear fellow list subscribers,
Yesterday I had the unpleasant experience that Mark Williamson scolded me for "Censor" and "Thought police". The reason was that I had deleted some of
the requests on the Requests for new languages page on meta (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages), and subsequently he placed most of them back, along with some other ones that had been removed by long, and not by me.
As a matter of facts, I got /furious/ and if Mark had stood right before me I would have spit into his face. Later however, he eludicated the reason why
he placed them back, and we seem to agree on more things than I thought at first. The page /is/ really getting overloaded with requests and becomes too
long. The difference was, he wanted to keep them anyway.
I may opinion, the right solution is to cut-and-paste them to an archive, newly to be created. I could very well create it right now, but thanks to Mark's great action I am unsure whether this wil be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Incompetent, inautoritive censor and thought police Wouter Steenbeek.
Btw: it seems perhaps a little inappropriate to discuss this meta topic on the Wikipedia mailing list, but since the topic is realted to the creation of new Wikipedias I took the liberty to post it here.
_________________________________________________________________ Speel online games via MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.nl/
_______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l