Lee Daniel Crocker wrote in response to me:
That's a bit complex, but maybe it could be made to
work. The analogy
to language links doesn't quite work for me because some human editor
has actually gone to the trouble of noting that the fr:chat article is
an appropriate French version of en:cat, whereas these will be fully
automatic. But I agree that it's a reasonably safe bet that X (Y) is
somehow related to X, X (Z), and X (disambiguation), because our
conventions here have created that association, so it's somewhat human-
created.
I don't think that one should stress much of an *analogy* to language links.
It should go no farther than that the place where language links now lie
would be a good place (one a separate line) to place these as well.
Another issue is performance. Perhaps we could help
both of those
issues by making a single link to a list page rather than a set of
links. But what to call that list is tricky. Is isn't really "related
pages" because they're only related lexigographically, not semantically.
Perhaps it could be something like "Other 'Foo' pages".
Or [[Foo (disambiguation)]]! ^_^
-- Toby