On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Sascha Noyes wrote:
The section
"Improper and undisclosed use of funds" could be precis'd into
about 6 sentences and no useful information would be lost. Similarly, both
lengthy quotations in "Secret Baptisms" could be summarised in about 40
words, including attributions.
Then why don't you do it? If you think that something is wrong with the
article you can change it. (Remember, this is a wiki)
I would like to do it, but I already get mightily angry looking at this
edit war from the outside. How much the more if I get habitually reverted
myself?
I have no interest in getting part of an edit war. I have no interest in
solving this dispute by seeing who has the longest breath. I don't know
what I do want though...
Andre Engels