[Wikipedia-l] Re: "How to get a girl"

Ilya N. wrote: I don't agree that the original planned purpose of Wikibooks must necessarily limit its scope forever. Besides, the very name "Wikibooks" is far too suggestive to stop people in the long-run from using it for the creation of books-that-aren't-textbooks (non-text books?). Besides, what is a textbook, anyway? If the "guidelines for people on the autistic spectrum" book is not allowed, why is the "Lucid Dreaming" book allowed? What does 'allowed' mean, anyway, given that it survived a community discussion on deletion? There are plenty of potential citations available for books on autism. As for the "how to get a girl", there's always psychological studies you can cite -- but then again, do you even need cites for such a book? Timwi