Your reasoning is strange to me, Mark, but that's not important (my not
understanding).
Sabine's intervention required tolerance in the formulated demands and/or
taken decisions. I agree with this. The proposed
compromise (moving mo to mo-cyr) is tolerant:
1. It stops the desinformation currently caused by
mo.wikipedia.org.
2. It doesn't destroy your work.
3. It maintains the basis for possible future expansion of the Moldovan
Wikipedia.
I will allow myself to note that this resolution is supported by another
Moldovan, Oleg Alexandrov
(although he maintains his indifference concerning the existance
itself of this Moldovan
Wikipedia).
On 7/4/06, Mark Williamson < node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The status quo is, in fact a compromise. It is a compromise because
the Romanian and Moldovan Wikipedias are both open.
And as Sabine said, vivi e lascia vivere -- why do you worry so much about
it?
Mark
On 04/07/06, Liviu Andronic <landronimirc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, Mark. The status quo is what you want. Not a
compromise.
Deleting/closing the Moldovan Wikipedia is - generally speaking - what
we
want.
Moving the existing contents from
mo.wikipedia.org to a certain
mo-cyr.wikipedia.org would be a compromise. And, once again,
this compromise doesn't destroy anyone's work. Just as Sabine said:
"Vivi e
> lascia vivere".
>
> On 7/4/06, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > Please see the messages from Sabine Cretella.
> >
> > The status quo is the compromise.
> >
> > If you care about Wikipedia, it makes sense to take care of your own
> > instead of trying to destroy what others have built, which is exactly
> > what you are doing here. There is no reason for this to continue.
> >
> > Mark
> >
--
Liviu