Your reasoning is strange to me, Mark, but that's not important (my not understanding).
Sabine's intervention required tolerance in the formulated demands and/or taken decisions. I agree with this. The proposed compromise (moving mo to mo-cyr) is tolerant:
1. It stops the desinformation currently caused by mo.wikipedia.org. 2. It doesn't destroy your work. 3. It maintains the basis for possible future expansion of the Moldovan Wikipedia.
I will allow myself to note that this resolution is supported by another Moldovan, Oleg Alexandrov (although he maintains his indifference concerning the existance itself of this Moldovan Wikipedia).
On 7/4/06, Mark Williamson < node.ue@gmail.com> wrote:
The status quo is, in fact a compromise. It is a compromise because the Romanian and Moldovan Wikipedias are both open.
And as Sabine said, vivi e lascia vivere -- why do you worry so much about it?
Mark
On 04/07/06, Liviu Andronic landronimirc@gmail.com wrote:
No, Mark. The status quo is what you want. Not a compromise.
Deleting/closing the Moldovan Wikipedia is - generally speaking - what
we
want.
Moving the existing contents from mo.wikipedia.org to a certain mo-cyr.wikipedia.org would be a compromise. And, once again, this compromise doesn't destroy anyone's work. Just as Sabine said:
"Vivi e
lascia vivere".
On 7/4/06, Mark Williamson <node.ue@gmail.com > wrote:
Please see the messages from Sabine Cretella.
The status quo is the compromise.
If you care about Wikipedia, it makes sense to take care of your own instead of trying to destroy what others have built, which is exactly what you are doing here. There is no reason for this to continue.
Mark