The most likely reason is that Wikipedia attracts intelligence, and
intelligent people are much more likely to be willing to consider
other possibilities and head down roads that unintelligent people
might not.
If I weren't intelligent, I probably would've ignored the fact that I
am attracted to other men, or said "I'm attracted to other men, but
I'm straight".
Intelligence isn't really the only factor though. A very intelligent
person from a lower socioeconomic class is less likely to be "out",
and a Dutch man is more likely to be "out" than a Korean man, who is
in turn more likely to be "out" than a Bhutanese man.
Mark
On 04/06/05, David 'DJ' Hedley <spyders(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
Jimmy Wales
(jwales(a)wikia.com) [050605 07:15]:
It is my estimate based on attending technology
conventions and
Wikimedia meetups that Wikipedia is less male dominated than free
software and tech generally, but still male dominated to an unfortunate
extent.
As far as we can tell discussing the topic on #wikipedia, Wikipedia is run
by a homosexual conspiracy. And the ones that aren't are transgender. IT'S
THE WIKIPEDIANS! THEY'RE IN IT WITH THE MARTIANS!
- d.
Indeed, the amount of openly LGBT Wikipedians is interestingly high. I don't
know why Wikipedia is so appealing to homosexual contributors, but it
appears to be that it is.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE