I just discovered wikipedia the other day and I'm just thrilled that
this thing exists. I authored the drug testing faq, and it's probably
about 5 years old now because I don't have time to maintain this
monster of a document. I've been planning to write software that does
almost exactly what Wikipedia does so that others could maintain it.
Now I don't have to!
To get to my question, would it be appropriate for me to post the drug
testing faq? I have the feeling that too much controversy might not
be appreciated here, but then the faq is pretty objective and factual.
It discusses methods that work and don't work for beating the test,
and it covers details on how tests are administered.
There may be some points where my anti-drug testing bias comes out,
but I'm thinking I could comb through the text and edit that out
before posting it. I pretty much isolated my opinions in the 'Ethics'
section of the faq.
I know I read somewhere that dramatic changes to wikipedia are
discouraged, so I only plan to post small pieces at a time as I edit
them.
Also, I just caught the end of a discussion on vikipedia (whatever
that is) and other languages. Some people have already translated the
drug testing faq into other languages. I could track those down and
post them as well, but I can't read them, so any edits that I make on
the english version will be disjoint from the other languages.
Is wikipedia the right place for me to post the faq, or is there
another *pedia that would be better suited?