On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:50:56PM -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
Tim Starling wrote:
A quick google search seems to imply that
"Modern Egyptian" is not
exactly a conlang. Rather, it seems to be a transliteration of Coptic to
the latin alphabet. This is all based on the only relevant google hit
for "modern egyptian language", so "Prince of Egypt" should feel free
to
enlighten us if this is incorrect.
Coptic has a perfectly good ISO 639 language code, 'cop', and is in no
way at all "a new conlang".
What I think it's funny is that Prince still keeps it secret what kind of
language he means. He could write a wikipedia article about it, or point us
to one. Name an official ISO or whatever (official, registered) code. I
believe that'd be a pretty obvious way to help us to decide.