Jonathan Walther wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:22:36AM +0000, Oliver
Pereira wrote:
I gather that it the general agreement is that
the User pages are for
the
users' own use, and that it is bad manners for other Wikipedians to edit
them. Would it be sensible to formalise this as a definitive rule - in
fact, to make the page protected from edits by anyone but the user
and the
sysops? Anyone who wishes to address the user would still be able to on
the associated Talk page, of course.
Lir is a special case, in that he used his User page to antagonize and
piss off a lot of Wikipedians. None of the recent edits in any way
attacked Lir personally; they just massaged the material to show how one
does things when one DOESN'T think the Wikipedia is just an information
dump, when one actually cares about what one is writing, and not just
the raw amount of information one dumps.
Why not just put your reactions to Lir on his User Talk page rather than
his User page.
I have a feeling Lir was trying to get on that list of
the top 250 most
prolific Wikipedians... Too bad for him it isn't dynamically generated.
This is yet more unsupported speculation.
I don't
know how difficult it would be to implement technically, but I
think it would be a good move to prevent people from vandalising other
people's User pages, as some are doing.
To call those edits "vandalism" is to use far too strong a word,
especially from an admitted newbie who isn't familiar with the full
history of Lir's actions here.
I don't think that a newbie should be prevented from expressing things
as he sees them. I know of no single page that clearly outlines the
case against Lir, and allows a newbie or any fair-minded Wikipedian to
separate fact from speculation.
Hmmm! It sounds like I'm suggesting policy relating to disciplinary
procedures. It could begin with an indictment page on which the
complainant states what individual A did wrong, and what should be done
about it. I'm afraid that further ideas on this will have to come
elsewhere.
And I repeat,
if anyone has any problems with my behaviour, please
tell me
on my Talk page, or in a private e-mail.
The only problem so far is your poorly informed defense of Lir. Apart
from that, it's good to have you on the Wikipedia.
Some of Lir's accusers were just as poorly informed as his defenders.
Eclecticology