Indeed, perhaps all articles should be marked as
stubs until they have
at least one revision by a contributor who was not
the original creator.
This will automatically catch any auto-generated
articles.
Neil
Maybe I have not understood *at all* what a stub was
???
I thought it was a very short article, in bad need of
being expanded ???
Are you not confusing *stub* with *not-reviewed
articles* here ?
If such a decision is taken, we'll have to set up a
new page "articles to be absolutely reviewed not to be
confused with stubs". I have a handful of articles
which I believe have never been edited by anybody. I
certainly would feel very insulted if they were listed
as stubs.
There is a need to catch automatically generated
articles, but not that way.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/